Head-to-Head Analysis

Sour Gummy Sharks Candy vs Life Savers Hard Candy Sugar Free

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sour Gummy Sharks Candy

Sour Gummy Sharks Candy

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Life Savers Hard Candy Sugar Free

Life Savers Hard Candy Sugar Free

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
367 kcal
Energy
200 kcal
73.3g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
0g
3.3g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sour Gummy Sharks Candy and Life Savers Hard Candy Sugar Free side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sour Gummy Sharks Candy is the more energy-dense option here, packing 167 more calories per 100g than Life Savers Hard Candy Sugar Free. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sour Gummy Sharks Candy contains significantly more sugar (73.3g) compared to the milder Life Savers Hard Candy Sugar Free (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Life Savers Hard Candy Sugar Free is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Sour Gummy Sharks Candy offers a protein boost with 3.33g per 100g, outperforming Life Savers Hard Candy Sugar Free in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sour Gummy Sharks Candy or Life Savers Hard Candy Sugar Free?

It depends on your goals. Sour Gummy Sharks Candy has 367 calories, while Life Savers Hard Candy Sugar Free has 200 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sour Gummy Sharks Candy vegan?

No, Sour Gummy Sharks Candy is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sour Gummy Sharks Candy and Life Savers Hard Candy Sugar Free?

There is a difference of 167 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.