Head-to-Head Analysis

Sour patch kids soft candy freeze fat free1x4 oz vs Lindor assorted chocolate

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sour patch kids soft candy freeze fat free1x4 oz

Sour patch kids soft candy freeze fat free1x4 oz

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Lindor assorted chocolate

Lindor assorted chocolate

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
367 kcal
Energy
639 kcal
76.7g
Sugars
36.1g
0g
Fat
50g
0g
Protein
5.6g
0.2g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sour patch kids soft candy freeze fat free1x4 oz and Lindor assorted chocolate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sour patch kids soft candy freeze fat free1x4 oz is the clear winner. With 272 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sour patch kids soft candy freeze fat free1x4 oz contains significantly more sugar (76.67g) compared to the milder Lindor assorted chocolate (36.1g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Lindor assorted chocolate is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sour patch kids soft candy freeze fat free1x4 oz or Lindor assorted chocolate?

It depends on your goals. Sour patch kids soft candy freeze fat free1x4 oz has 367 calories, while Lindor assorted chocolate has 639 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sour patch kids soft candy freeze fat free1x4 oz vegan?

No, Sour patch kids soft candy freeze fat free1x4 oz is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sour patch kids soft candy freeze fat free1x4 oz and Lindor assorted chocolate?

There is a difference of 272 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.