Head-to-Head Analysis

Sour Patch Kids Watermelon vs Omega Trek Mix Dried Cranberry & Roasted Nut Blend

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sour Patch Kids Watermelon

Sour Patch Kids Watermelon

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Omega Trek Mix Dried Cranberry & Roasted Nut Blend

Omega Trek Mix Dried Cranberry & Roasted Nut Blend

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
375 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
78.1g
Sugars
29.4g
0g
Fat
35.3g
0g
Protein
11.8g
0.3g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sour Patch Kids Watermelon and Omega Trek Mix Dried Cranberry & Roasted Nut Blend side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sour Patch Kids Watermelon is the clear winner. With 125 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sour Patch Kids Watermelon contains significantly more sugar (78.125g) compared to the milder Omega Trek Mix Dried Cranberry & Roasted Nut Blend (29.411764705882g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Omega Trek Mix Dried Cranberry & Roasted Nut Blend is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sour Patch Kids Watermelon or Omega Trek Mix Dried Cranberry & Roasted Nut Blend?

It depends on your goals. Sour Patch Kids Watermelon has 375 calories, while Omega Trek Mix Dried Cranberry & Roasted Nut Blend has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sour Patch Kids Watermelon vegan?

No, Sour Patch Kids Watermelon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sour Patch Kids Watermelon and Omega Trek Mix Dried Cranberry & Roasted Nut Blend?

There is a difference of 125 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.