Head-to-Head Analysis

Sour Strawberry Candy Belts vs Olive Oil Kettle Cooked Potato Chips, Classic Sea Salt

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sour Strawberry Candy Belts

Sour Strawberry Candy Belts

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Olive Oil Kettle Cooked Potato Chips, Classic Sea Salt

Olive Oil Kettle Cooked Potato Chips, Classic Sea Salt

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
367 kcal
Energy
536 kcal
63.3g
Sugars
0g
1.7g
Fat
32.1g
3.3g
Protein
7.1g
0g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sour Strawberry Candy Belts and Olive Oil Kettle Cooked Potato Chips, Classic Sea Salt side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sour Strawberry Candy Belts is the clear winner. With 169 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sour Strawberry Candy Belts contains significantly more sugar (63.3g) compared to the milder Olive Oil Kettle Cooked Potato Chips, Classic Sea Salt (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Olive Oil Kettle Cooked Potato Chips, Classic Sea Salt is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sour Strawberry Candy Belts or Olive Oil Kettle Cooked Potato Chips, Classic Sea Salt?

It depends on your goals. Sour Strawberry Candy Belts has 367 calories, while Olive Oil Kettle Cooked Potato Chips, Classic Sea Salt has 536 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sour Strawberry Candy Belts vegan?

No, Sour Strawberry Candy Belts is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sour Strawberry Candy Belts and Olive Oil Kettle Cooked Potato Chips, Classic Sea Salt?

There is a difference of 169 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.