Head-to-Head Analysis

Southern style white corn grits vs Slow kettle Style soup tomato basil

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Southern style white corn grits

Southern style white corn grits

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Slow kettle Style soup tomato basil

Slow kettle Style soup tomato basil

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
350 kcal
Energy
270 kcal
0g
Sugars
21g
0g
Fat
15g
7.5g
Protein
3g
0g
Salt
2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Southern style white corn grits and Slow kettle Style soup tomato basil side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Southern style white corn grits is the more energy-dense option here, packing 80 more calories per 100g than Slow kettle Style soup tomato basil. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Southern style white corn grits takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Slow kettle Style soup tomato basil contains 21g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Southern style white corn grits offers a protein boost with 7.5g per 100g, outperforming Slow kettle Style soup tomato basil in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Southern style white corn grits or Slow kettle Style soup tomato basil?

It depends on your goals. Southern style white corn grits has 350 calories, while Slow kettle Style soup tomato basil has 270 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Southern style white corn grits vegan?

No, Southern style white corn grits is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Southern style white corn grits and Slow kettle Style soup tomato basil?

There is a difference of 80 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.