Head-to-Head Analysis

Southwest Ranch Chicken Taco Seasoning Mix vs Double Stuf Gluten Free Oreo

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Southwest Ranch Chicken Taco Seasoning Mix

Southwest Ranch Chicken Taco Seasoning Mix

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Double Stuf Gluten Free Oreo

Double Stuf Gluten Free Oreo

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
333.3 kcal
Energy
483 kcal
16.7g
Sugars
44.8g
0g
Fat
24.1g
16.7g
Protein
3.5g
20g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Southwest Ranch Chicken Taco Seasoning Mix and Double Stuf Gluten Free Oreo side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Southwest Ranch Chicken Taco Seasoning Mix is the clear winner. With 150 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Southwest Ranch Chicken Taco Seasoning Mix takes the lead with only 16.666666666667g of sugar per 100g, whereas Double Stuf Gluten Free Oreo contains 44.8g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Southwest Ranch Chicken Taco Seasoning Mix offers a protein boost with 16.666666666667g per 100g, outperforming Double Stuf Gluten Free Oreo in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Southwest Ranch Chicken Taco Seasoning Mix or Double Stuf Gluten Free Oreo?

Southwest Ranch Chicken Taco Seasoning Mix appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Southwest Ranch Chicken Taco Seasoning Mix vegan?

No, Southwest Ranch Chicken Taco Seasoning Mix is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Southwest Ranch Chicken Taco Seasoning Mix and Double Stuf Gluten Free Oreo?

There is a difference of 150 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.