Head-to-Head Analysis

Southwest Style Turkey & Rice vs Avocado oil canyon cut kettle cooked potato chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Southwest Style Turkey & Rice

Southwest Style Turkey & Rice

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Avocado oil canyon cut kettle cooked potato chips

Avocado oil canyon cut kettle cooked potato chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
95.7 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
1.3g
Sugars
0g
2.8g
Fat
21.4g
8.1g
Protein
7.1g
0.5g
Salt
2.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Southwest Style Turkey & Rice and Avocado oil canyon cut kettle cooked potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Southwest Style Turkey & Rice is the clear winner. With 404 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Southwest Style Turkey & Rice contains significantly more sugar (1.26g) compared to the milder Avocado oil canyon cut kettle cooked potato chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Avocado oil canyon cut kettle cooked potato chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Southwest Style Turkey & Rice or Avocado oil canyon cut kettle cooked potato chips?

It depends on your goals. Southwest Style Turkey & Rice has 95.7 calories, while Avocado oil canyon cut kettle cooked potato chips has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Southwest Style Turkey & Rice vegan?

No, Southwest Style Turkey & Rice is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Southwest Style Turkey & Rice and Avocado oil canyon cut kettle cooked potato chips?

There is a difference of 404 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.