Head-to-Head Analysis

Soybeans Edamame vs kettle cooked chips sea salt and cracked pepper

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Soybeans Edamame

Soybeans Edamame

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of kettle cooked chips sea salt and cracked pepper

kettle cooked chips sea salt and cracked pepper

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
127 kcal
Energy
140 kcal
2.8g
Sugars
0.5g
2.8g
Fat
7g
12.7g
Protein
2g
0g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Soybeans Edamame and kettle cooked chips sea salt and cracked pepper side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Soybeans Edamame is the clear winner. With 13 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Soybeans Edamame contains significantly more sugar (2.82g) compared to the milder kettle cooked chips sea salt and cracked pepper (0.5g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, kettle cooked chips sea salt and cracked pepper is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Soybeans Edamame offers a protein boost with 12.7g per 100g, outperforming kettle cooked chips sea salt and cracked pepper in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Soybeans Edamame or kettle cooked chips sea salt and cracked pepper?

It depends on your goals. Soybeans Edamame has 127 calories, while kettle cooked chips sea salt and cracked pepper has 140 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Soybeans Edamame vegan?

No, Soybeans Edamame is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Soybeans Edamame and kettle cooked chips sea salt and cracked pepper?

There is a difference of 13 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.