Head-to-Head Analysis

Sparkling White Grape Juice Cocktail, Non-Alcoholic vs 5 prism slim pack gum

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sparkling White Grape Juice Cocktail, Non-Alcoholic

Sparkling White Grape Juice Cocktail, Non-Alcoholic

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of 5 prism slim pack gum

5 prism slim pack gum

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
48.4 kcal
Energy
5 kcal
11.7g
Sugars
2g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sparkling White Grape Juice Cocktail, Non-Alcoholic and 5 prism slim pack gum side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sparkling White Grape Juice Cocktail, Non-Alcoholic is the more energy-dense option here, packing 43 more calories per 100g than 5 prism slim pack gum. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sparkling White Grape Juice Cocktail, Non-Alcoholic contains significantly more sugar (11.7g) compared to the milder 5 prism slim pack gum (2g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, 5 prism slim pack gum is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sparkling White Grape Juice Cocktail, Non-Alcoholic or 5 prism slim pack gum?

It depends on your goals. Sparkling White Grape Juice Cocktail, Non-Alcoholic has 48.4 calories, while 5 prism slim pack gum has 5 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sparkling White Grape Juice Cocktail, Non-Alcoholic vegan?

No, Sparkling White Grape Juice Cocktail, Non-Alcoholic is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sparkling White Grape Juice Cocktail, Non-Alcoholic and 5 prism slim pack gum?

There is a difference of 43 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.