Head-to-Head Analysis

Sparkling White Grape Juice Cocktail, Non-Alcoholic vs Classic Potato Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sparkling White Grape Juice Cocktail, Non-Alcoholic

Sparkling White Grape Juice Cocktail, Non-Alcoholic

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Classic Potato Chips

Classic Potato Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
48.4 kcal
Energy
571.4 kcal
11.7g
Sugars
3.6g
0g
Fat
35.7g
0g
Protein
3.6g
0g
Salt
1.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sparkling White Grape Juice Cocktail, Non-Alcoholic and Classic Potato Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sparkling White Grape Juice Cocktail, Non-Alcoholic is the clear winner. With 523 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sparkling White Grape Juice Cocktail, Non-Alcoholic contains significantly more sugar (11.7g) compared to the milder Classic Potato Chips (3.5714285714286g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Classic Potato Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sparkling White Grape Juice Cocktail, Non-Alcoholic or Classic Potato Chips?

It depends on your goals. Sparkling White Grape Juice Cocktail, Non-Alcoholic has 48.4 calories, while Classic Potato Chips has 571.42857142857 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sparkling White Grape Juice Cocktail, Non-Alcoholic vegan?

No, Sparkling White Grape Juice Cocktail, Non-Alcoholic is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sparkling White Grape Juice Cocktail, Non-Alcoholic and Classic Potato Chips?

There is a difference of 523 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.