Head-to-Head Analysis

Spearmint sugar-free gum value vs Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Spearmint sugar-free gum value

Spearmint sugar-free gum value

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry

Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
200 kcal
Energy
5 kcal
80g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Spearmint sugar-free gum value and Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Spearmint sugar-free gum value is the more energy-dense option here, packing 195 more calories per 100g than Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Spearmint sugar-free gum value contains significantly more sugar (80g) compared to the milder Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Spearmint sugar-free gum value or Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry?

It depends on your goals. Spearmint sugar-free gum value has 200 calories, while Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry has 5 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Spearmint sugar-free gum value vegan?

No, Spearmint sugar-free gum value is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Spearmint sugar-free gum value and Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry?

There is a difference of 195 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.