Head-to-Head Analysis

Special K Red Berries vs Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Special K Red Berries

Special K Red Berries

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored

Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
359 kcal
Energy
330 kcal
28.2g
Sugars
36.7g
1.3g
Fat
1.7g
7.7g
Protein
3.3g
1.6g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Special K Red Berries and Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Special K Red Berries is the more energy-dense option here, packing 29 more calories per 100g than Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Special K Red Berries takes the lead with only 28.2g of sugar per 100g, whereas Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored contains 36.67g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Special K Red Berries offers a protein boost with 7.69g per 100g, outperforming Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Special K Red Berries or Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored?

It depends on your goals. Special K Red Berries has 359 calories, while Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored has 330 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Special K Red Berries vegan?

No, Special K Red Berries is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Special K Red Berries and Soft Australian Licorice Strawberry Flavored?

There is a difference of 29 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.