Head-to-Head Analysis

Spice paste for thai spicy basil stir fry vs Italian Dressing, Restaurant Style

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Spice paste for thai spicy basil stir fry

Spice paste for thai spicy basil stir fry

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Italian Dressing, Restaurant Style

Italian Dressing, Restaurant Style

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
192 kcal
Energy
267 kcal
7.7g
Sugars
6.7g
11.5g
Fat
26.7g
0g
Protein
0g
10g
Salt
4.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Spice paste for thai spicy basil stir fry and Italian Dressing, Restaurant Style side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Spice paste for thai spicy basil stir fry is the clear winner. With 75 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Spice paste for thai spicy basil stir fry contains significantly more sugar (7.69g) compared to the milder Italian Dressing, Restaurant Style (6.67g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Italian Dressing, Restaurant Style is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Spice paste for thai spicy basil stir fry or Italian Dressing, Restaurant Style?

It depends on your goals. Spice paste for thai spicy basil stir fry has 192 calories, while Italian Dressing, Restaurant Style has 267 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Spice paste for thai spicy basil stir fry vegan?

No, Spice paste for thai spicy basil stir fry is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Spice paste for thai spicy basil stir fry and Italian Dressing, Restaurant Style?

There is a difference of 75 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.