Head-to-Head Analysis

Spicy Green Chili Flavored Kettle Style Potato Chips vs Awesome long rolls

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Spicy Green Chili Flavored Kettle Style Potato Chips

Spicy Green Chili Flavored Kettle Style Potato Chips

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Awesome long rolls

Awesome long rolls

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
536 kcal
Energy
200 kcal
7.1g
Sugars
3g
28.6g
Fat
3g
7.1g
Protein
7g
2g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Spicy Green Chili Flavored Kettle Style Potato Chips and Awesome long rolls side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Spicy Green Chili Flavored Kettle Style Potato Chips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 336 more calories per 100g than Awesome long rolls. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Spicy Green Chili Flavored Kettle Style Potato Chips contains significantly more sugar (7.14g) compared to the milder Awesome long rolls (3g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Awesome long rolls is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Spicy Green Chili Flavored Kettle Style Potato Chips or Awesome long rolls?

It depends on your goals. Spicy Green Chili Flavored Kettle Style Potato Chips has 536 calories, while Awesome long rolls has 200 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Spicy Green Chili Flavored Kettle Style Potato Chips vegan?

No, Spicy Green Chili Flavored Kettle Style Potato Chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Spicy Green Chili Flavored Kettle Style Potato Chips and Awesome long rolls?

There is a difference of 336 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.