Head-to-Head Analysis

Spicy Tuna Poke vs Crinkle cut sweet potato chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Spicy Tuna Poke

Spicy Tuna Poke

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Crinkle cut sweet potato chips

Crinkle cut sweet potato chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
143 kcal
Energy
535.7 kcal
1.4g
Sugars
14.3g
5.7g
Fat
32.1g
15.7g
Protein
3.6g
1.1g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Spicy Tuna Poke and Crinkle cut sweet potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Spicy Tuna Poke is the clear winner. With 393 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Spicy Tuna Poke takes the lead with only 1.43g of sugar per 100g, whereas Crinkle cut sweet potato chips contains 14.285714285714g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Spicy Tuna Poke offers a protein boost with 15.7g per 100g, outperforming Crinkle cut sweet potato chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Spicy Tuna Poke or Crinkle cut sweet potato chips?

Spicy Tuna Poke appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Spicy Tuna Poke vegan?

No, Spicy Tuna Poke is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Spicy Tuna Poke and Crinkle cut sweet potato chips?

There is a difference of 393 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.