Head-to-Head Analysis

Spinach Mozzarella Chicken Quesadillas vs Bare baked crunchy sweet potato chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Spinach Mozzarella Chicken Quesadillas

Spinach Mozzarella Chicken Quesadillas

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Bare baked crunchy sweet potato chips

Bare baked crunchy sweet potato chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
173 kcal
Energy
375 kcal
1g
Sugars
27.5g
5.7g
Fat
0g
15.7g
Protein
7.5g
0.7g
Salt
1.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Spinach Mozzarella Chicken Quesadillas and Bare baked crunchy sweet potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Spinach Mozzarella Chicken Quesadillas is the clear winner. With 202 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Spinach Mozzarella Chicken Quesadillas takes the lead with only 1g of sugar per 100g, whereas Bare baked crunchy sweet potato chips contains 27.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Spinach Mozzarella Chicken Quesadillas offers a protein boost with 15.7g per 100g, outperforming Bare baked crunchy sweet potato chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Spinach Mozzarella Chicken Quesadillas or Bare baked crunchy sweet potato chips?

Spinach Mozzarella Chicken Quesadillas appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Spinach Mozzarella Chicken Quesadillas vegan?

No, Spinach Mozzarella Chicken Quesadillas is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Spinach Mozzarella Chicken Quesadillas and Bare baked crunchy sweet potato chips?

There is a difference of 202 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.