Head-to-Head Analysis

spiral sliced ham vs Organic boneless & skinless chicken breasts with rib meat

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of spiral sliced ham

spiral sliced ham

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic boneless & skinless chicken breasts with rib meat

Organic boneless & skinless chicken breasts with rib meat

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
167 kcal
Energy
115 kcal
6g
Sugars
0g
8.3g
Fat
2.7g
16.7g
Protein
22g
2.5g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing spiral sliced ham and Organic boneless & skinless chicken breasts with rib meat side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

spiral sliced ham is the more energy-dense option here, packing 52 more calories per 100g than Organic boneless & skinless chicken breasts with rib meat. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. spiral sliced ham contains significantly more sugar (5.95g) compared to the milder Organic boneless & skinless chicken breasts with rib meat (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic boneless & skinless chicken breasts with rib meat is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: spiral sliced ham or Organic boneless & skinless chicken breasts with rib meat?

It depends on your goals. spiral sliced ham has 167 calories, while Organic boneless & skinless chicken breasts with rib meat has 115 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is spiral sliced ham vegan?

No, spiral sliced ham is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between spiral sliced ham and Organic boneless & skinless chicken breasts with rib meat?

There is a difference of 52 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.