Sponch vs dark chocolate covered almonds
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Sponch
dark chocolate covered almonds
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Sponch and dark chocolate covered almonds side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Sponch is the more energy-dense option here, packing 356 more calories per 100g than dark chocolate covered almonds. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Sponch contains significantly more sugar (46.666666666667g) compared to the milder dark chocolate covered almonds (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, dark chocolate covered almonds is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Sponch offers a protein boost with 3.3333333333333g per 100g, outperforming dark chocolate covered almonds in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Sponch or dark chocolate covered almonds?
It depends on your goals. Sponch has 355.55555555556 calories, while dark chocolate covered almonds has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Sponch vegan?
No, Sponch is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Sponch and dark chocolate covered almonds?
There is a difference of 356 calories per 100g between the two products.
