Head-to-Head Analysis

Sprouts Chicken Caesar Wrap vs Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sprouts Chicken Caesar Wrap

Sprouts Chicken Caesar Wrap

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips

Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
250 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
1.1g
Sugars
0g
13.4g
Fat
0g
16.9g
Protein
0g
0.8g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sprouts Chicken Caesar Wrap and Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sprouts Chicken Caesar Wrap is the more energy-dense option here, packing 250 more calories per 100g than Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sprouts Chicken Caesar Wrap contains significantly more sugar (1.06g) compared to the milder Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Sprouts Chicken Caesar Wrap offers a protein boost with 16.9g per 100g, outperforming Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sprouts Chicken Caesar Wrap or Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips?

It depends on your goals. Sprouts Chicken Caesar Wrap has 250 calories, while Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sprouts Chicken Caesar Wrap vegan?

No, Sprouts Chicken Caesar Wrap is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sprouts Chicken Caesar Wrap and Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips?

There is a difference of 250 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.