Head-to-Head Analysis

Sriracha Peanuts vs Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sriracha Peanuts

Sriracha Peanuts

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium

Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
571 kcal
Energy
300 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
0g
50g
Fat
30g
25g
Protein
0g
0.9g
Salt
6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sriracha Peanuts and Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sriracha Peanuts is the more energy-dense option here, packing 271 more calories per 100g than Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sriracha Peanuts contains significantly more sugar (3.57g) compared to the milder Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Sriracha Peanuts offers a protein boost with 25g per 100g, outperforming Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sriracha Peanuts or Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium?

It depends on your goals. Sriracha Peanuts has 571 calories, while Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium has 300 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sriracha Peanuts vegan?

No, Sriracha Peanuts is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sriracha Peanuts and Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium?

There is a difference of 271 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.