Head-to-Head Analysis

St. Moritz Mule vs California almonds roasted with sea salt

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of St. Moritz Mule

St. Moritz Mule

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of California almonds roasted with sea salt

California almonds roasted with sea salt

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
23.3 kcal
Energy
607 kcal
4g
Sugars
3.6g
0g
Fat
57.1g
0g
Protein
21.4g
0g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing St. Moritz Mule and California almonds roasted with sea salt side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, St. Moritz Mule is the clear winner. With 584 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: St. Moritz Mule or California almonds roasted with sea salt?

It depends on your goals. St. Moritz Mule has 23.3 calories, while California almonds roasted with sea salt has 607 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is St. Moritz Mule vegan?

No, St. Moritz Mule is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between St. Moritz Mule and California almonds roasted with sea salt?

There is a difference of 584 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.