Head-to-Head Analysis

Stagg, Beef Chili No Beans vs Campbell's soup chicken & rice

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Stagg, Beef Chili No Beans

Stagg, Beef Chili No Beans

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Campbell's soup chicken & rice

Campbell's soup chicken & rice

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
123 kcal
Energy
67 kcal
3g
Sugars
0g
8.1g
Fat
1.7g
5.1g
Protein
1.7g
0g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Stagg, Beef Chili No Beans and Campbell's soup chicken & rice side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Stagg, Beef Chili No Beans is the more energy-dense option here, packing 56 more calories per 100g than Campbell's soup chicken & rice. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Stagg, Beef Chili No Beans contains significantly more sugar (2.97g) compared to the milder Campbell's soup chicken & rice (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Campbell's soup chicken & rice is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Stagg, Beef Chili No Beans offers a protein boost with 5.08g per 100g, outperforming Campbell's soup chicken & rice in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Stagg, Beef Chili No Beans or Campbell's soup chicken & rice?

It depends on your goals. Stagg, Beef Chili No Beans has 123 calories, while Campbell's soup chicken & rice has 67 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Stagg, Beef Chili No Beans vegan?

No, Stagg, Beef Chili No Beans is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Stagg, Beef Chili No Beans and Campbell's soup chicken & rice?

There is a difference of 56 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.