Head-to-Head Analysis

Stagg, Silverado Beef Chili With Beans vs H-E-B Chile Lime Chicharrones Pork Rinds

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Stagg, Silverado Beef Chili With Beans

Stagg, Silverado Beef Chili With Beans

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of H-E-B Chile Lime Chicharrones Pork Rinds

H-E-B Chile Lime Chicharrones Pork Rinds

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
109 kcal
Energy
571 kcal
3.2g
Sugars
0g
3.6g
Fat
32.1g
6.5g
Protein
57.1g
0.9g
Salt
7.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Stagg, Silverado Beef Chili With Beans and H-E-B Chile Lime Chicharrones Pork Rinds side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Stagg, Silverado Beef Chili With Beans is the clear winner. With 462 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Stagg, Silverado Beef Chili With Beans contains significantly more sugar (3.24g) compared to the milder H-E-B Chile Lime Chicharrones Pork Rinds (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, H-E-B Chile Lime Chicharrones Pork Rinds is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Stagg, Silverado Beef Chili With Beans or H-E-B Chile Lime Chicharrones Pork Rinds?

It depends on your goals. Stagg, Silverado Beef Chili With Beans has 109 calories, while H-E-B Chile Lime Chicharrones Pork Rinds has 571 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Stagg, Silverado Beef Chili With Beans vegan?

No, Stagg, Silverado Beef Chili With Beans is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Stagg, Silverado Beef Chili With Beans and H-E-B Chile Lime Chicharrones Pork Rinds?

There is a difference of 462 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.