Head-to-Head Analysis

Starbucks decaf house blend vs Fresh squeezed tomato juice

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Starbucks decaf house blend

Starbucks decaf house blend

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Fresh squeezed tomato juice

Fresh squeezed tomato juice

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
16.7 kcal
0g
Sugars
2.5g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0.8g
0g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Starbucks decaf house blend and Fresh squeezed tomato juice side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Starbucks decaf house blend is the clear winner. With 17 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Starbucks decaf house blend takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Fresh squeezed tomato juice contains 2.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Starbucks decaf house blend or Fresh squeezed tomato juice?

Starbucks decaf house blend appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Starbucks decaf house blend vegan?

No, Starbucks decaf house blend is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Starbucks decaf house blend and Fresh squeezed tomato juice?

There is a difference of 17 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.