Head-to-Head Analysis

Starbucks Mountain blend vs Thin Stackers Dark Chocolate, Coconut Sprinkle

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Starbucks Mountain blend

Starbucks Mountain blend

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Thin Stackers Dark Chocolate, Coconut Sprinkle

Thin Stackers Dark Chocolate, Coconut Sprinkle

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
468.8 kcal
0g
Sugars
15.6g
0g
Fat
25g
0g
Protein
6.3g
0g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Starbucks Mountain blend and Thin Stackers Dark Chocolate, Coconut Sprinkle side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Starbucks Mountain blend is the clear winner. With 469 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Starbucks Mountain blend takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Thin Stackers Dark Chocolate, Coconut Sprinkle contains 15.625g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Starbucks Mountain blend or Thin Stackers Dark Chocolate, Coconut Sprinkle?

Starbucks Mountain blend appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Starbucks Mountain blend vegan?

No, Starbucks Mountain blend is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Starbucks Mountain blend and Thin Stackers Dark Chocolate, Coconut Sprinkle?

There is a difference of 469 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.