Head-to-Head Analysis

Starbucksfrappuccinomochacoffeedrink vs 100% Blueberry Juice

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Starbucksfrappuccinomochacoffeedrink

Starbucksfrappuccinomochacoffeedrink

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of 100% Blueberry Juice

100% Blueberry Juice

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
63 kcal
Energy
41.7 kcal
10.9g
Sugars
7.9g
1.1g
Fat
0g
2.5g
Protein
0g
0.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Starbucksfrappuccinomochacoffeedrink and 100% Blueberry Juice side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Starbucksfrappuccinomochacoffeedrink is the more energy-dense option here, packing 21 more calories per 100g than 100% Blueberry Juice. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Starbucksfrappuccinomochacoffeedrink contains significantly more sugar (10.88g) compared to the milder 100% Blueberry Juice (7.92g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, 100% Blueberry Juice is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Starbucksfrappuccinomochacoffeedrink offers a protein boost with 2.46g per 100g, outperforming 100% Blueberry Juice in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Starbucksfrappuccinomochacoffeedrink or 100% Blueberry Juice?

It depends on your goals. Starbucksfrappuccinomochacoffeedrink has 63 calories, while 100% Blueberry Juice has 41.67 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Starbucksfrappuccinomochacoffeedrink vegan?

No, Starbucksfrappuccinomochacoffeedrink is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Starbucksfrappuccinomochacoffeedrink and 100% Blueberry Juice?

There is a difference of 21 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.