Head-to-Head Analysis

Starburst Original vs Basil & garlic woven with quinoa seeds crackers, basil & garlic

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Starburst Original

Starburst Original

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Basil & garlic woven with quinoa seeds crackers, basil & garlic

Basil & garlic woven with quinoa seeds crackers, basil & garlic

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
240 kcal
Energy
429 kcal
33g
Sugars
3.6g
5g
Fat
14.3g
0g
Protein
10.7g
0g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Starburst Original and Basil & garlic woven with quinoa seeds crackers, basil & garlic side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Starburst Original is the clear winner. With 189 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Starburst Original contains significantly more sugar (33.002g) compared to the milder Basil & garlic woven with quinoa seeds crackers, basil & garlic (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Basil & garlic woven with quinoa seeds crackers, basil & garlic is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Starburst Original or Basil & garlic woven with quinoa seeds crackers, basil & garlic?

It depends on your goals. Starburst Original has 240 calories, while Basil & garlic woven with quinoa seeds crackers, basil & garlic has 429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Starburst Original vegan?

No, Starburst Original is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Starburst Original and Basil & garlic woven with quinoa seeds crackers, basil & garlic?

There is a difference of 189 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.