Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water vs Tilapia Skinless Fillets
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water
Tilapia Skinless Fillets
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water and Tilapia Skinless Fillets side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water is the more energy-dense option here, packing 27 more calories per 100g than Tilapia Skinless Fillets. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
Looking to build muscle? Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water offers a protein boost with 26.5g per 100g, outperforming Tilapia Skinless Fillets in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water or Tilapia Skinless Fillets?
It depends on your goals. Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water has 115 calories, while Tilapia Skinless Fillets has 88 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water vegan?
No, Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water and Tilapia Skinless Fillets?
There is a difference of 27 calories per 100g between the two products.
