Head-to-Head Analysis

Steak-ums vs Bacon naturally hardwood smoked

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Steak-ums

Steak-ums

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Bacon naturally hardwood smoked

Bacon naturally hardwood smoked

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
406 kcal
Energy
474 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
34.4g
Fat
42.1g
21.9g
Protein
31.6g
0.2g
Salt
4.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Steak-ums and Bacon naturally hardwood smoked side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Steak-ums is the clear winner. With 68 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Steak-ums or Bacon naturally hardwood smoked?

It depends on your goals. Steak-ums has 406 calories, while Bacon naturally hardwood smoked has 474 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Steak-ums vegan?

No, Steak-ums is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Steak-ums and Bacon naturally hardwood smoked?

There is a difference of 68 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.