Head-to-Head Analysis

strawberry fields vs Unsweetened original almond milk

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of strawberry fields

strawberry fields

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Unsweetened original almond milk

Unsweetened original almond milk

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
16.9 kcal
Energy
20.8 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
1.7g
0g
Protein
0.8g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing strawberry fields and Unsweetened original almond milk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, strawberry fields is the clear winner. With 4 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. strawberry fields contains significantly more sugar (3.62g) compared to the milder Unsweetened original almond milk (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Unsweetened original almond milk is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: strawberry fields or Unsweetened original almond milk?

It depends on your goals. strawberry fields has 16.9 calories, while Unsweetened original almond milk has 20.8333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is strawberry fields vegan?

No, strawberry fields is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between strawberry fields and Unsweetened original almond milk?

There is a difference of 4 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.