Head-to-Head Analysis

Strawberry Flavored Hard Candy vs The original buttercrunch toffee with almonds

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Strawberry Flavored Hard Candy

Strawberry Flavored Hard Candy

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of The original buttercrunch toffee with almonds

The original buttercrunch toffee with almonds

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
357.1 kcal
Energy
556 kcal
71.4g
Sugars
44.4g
0g
Fat
38.9g
0g
Protein
5.6g
0g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Strawberry Flavored Hard Candy and The original buttercrunch toffee with almonds side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Strawberry Flavored Hard Candy is the clear winner. With 199 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Strawberry Flavored Hard Candy contains significantly more sugar (71.428571428571g) compared to the milder The original buttercrunch toffee with almonds (44.44g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, The original buttercrunch toffee with almonds is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Strawberry Flavored Hard Candy or The original buttercrunch toffee with almonds?

It depends on your goals. Strawberry Flavored Hard Candy has 357.14285714286 calories, while The original buttercrunch toffee with almonds has 556 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Strawberry Flavored Hard Candy vegan?

No, Strawberry Flavored Hard Candy is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Strawberry Flavored Hard Candy and The original buttercrunch toffee with almonds?

There is a difference of 199 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.