Head-to-Head Analysis

Strawberry fruitscato vs Sweet southern heat bbq kettle chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Strawberry fruitscato

Strawberry fruitscato

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sweet southern heat bbq kettle chips

Sweet southern heat bbq kettle chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
160 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
16g
Sugars
10.7g
0g
Fat
25g
0g
Protein
7.1g
0g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Strawberry fruitscato and Sweet southern heat bbq kettle chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Strawberry fruitscato is the clear winner. With 340 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Strawberry fruitscato contains significantly more sugar (16g) compared to the milder Sweet southern heat bbq kettle chips (10.71g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sweet southern heat bbq kettle chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Strawberry fruitscato or Sweet southern heat bbq kettle chips?

It depends on your goals. Strawberry fruitscato has 160 calories, while Sweet southern heat bbq kettle chips has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Strawberry fruitscato vegan?

No, Strawberry fruitscato is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Strawberry fruitscato and Sweet southern heat bbq kettle chips?

There is a difference of 340 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.