Head-to-Head Analysis

Strawberry Pie Filling or Topping vs Bisquick Shake 'N Pour Buttermilk Pancake Mix

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Strawberry Pie Filling or Topping

Strawberry Pie Filling or Topping

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Bisquick Shake 'N Pour Buttermilk Pancake Mix

Bisquick Shake 'N Pour Buttermilk Pancake Mix

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
94 kcal
Energy
365 kcal
17.7g
Sugars
14.3g
0g
Fat
4.8g
0g
Protein
9.5g
0g
Salt
1.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Strawberry Pie Filling or Topping and Bisquick Shake 'N Pour Buttermilk Pancake Mix side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Strawberry Pie Filling or Topping is the clear winner. With 271 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Strawberry Pie Filling or Topping contains significantly more sugar (17.65g) compared to the milder Bisquick Shake 'N Pour Buttermilk Pancake Mix (14.29g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Bisquick Shake 'N Pour Buttermilk Pancake Mix is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Strawberry Pie Filling or Topping or Bisquick Shake 'N Pour Buttermilk Pancake Mix?

It depends on your goals. Strawberry Pie Filling or Topping has 94 calories, while Bisquick Shake 'N Pour Buttermilk Pancake Mix has 365 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Strawberry Pie Filling or Topping vegan?

No, Strawberry Pie Filling or Topping is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Strawberry Pie Filling or Topping and Bisquick Shake 'N Pour Buttermilk Pancake Mix?

There is a difference of 271 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.