Head-to-Head Analysis

Street Food Teriyaki Style Rice with Chicken vs Natural Apricot Fruit Spread

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Street Food Teriyaki Style Rice with Chicken

Street Food Teriyaki Style Rice with Chicken

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Natural Apricot Fruit Spread

Natural Apricot Fruit Spread

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
169 kcal
Energy
210.5 kcal
5.5g
Sugars
52.6g
3.9g
Fat
0g
5.1g
Protein
0g
0.7g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Street Food Teriyaki Style Rice with Chicken and Natural Apricot Fruit Spread side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Street Food Teriyaki Style Rice with Chicken is the clear winner. With 42 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Street Food Teriyaki Style Rice with Chicken takes the lead with only 5.49g of sugar per 100g, whereas Natural Apricot Fruit Spread contains 52.631578947368g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Street Food Teriyaki Style Rice with Chicken offers a protein boost with 5.1g per 100g, outperforming Natural Apricot Fruit Spread in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Street Food Teriyaki Style Rice with Chicken or Natural Apricot Fruit Spread?

Street Food Teriyaki Style Rice with Chicken appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Street Food Teriyaki Style Rice with Chicken vegan?

No, Street Food Teriyaki Style Rice with Chicken is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Street Food Teriyaki Style Rice with Chicken and Natural Apricot Fruit Spread?

There is a difference of 42 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.