String Cheese Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese vs Nonfat Chocolate Milk
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
String Cheese Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese
Nonfat Chocolate Milk
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing String Cheese Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese and Nonfat Chocolate Milk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
String Cheese Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese is the more energy-dense option here, packing 228 more calories per 100g than Nonfat Chocolate Milk. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, String Cheese Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Nonfat Chocolate Milk contains 9.1666666666667g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? String Cheese Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese offers a protein boost with 25g per 100g, outperforming Nonfat Chocolate Milk in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: String Cheese Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese or Nonfat Chocolate Milk?
It depends on your goals. String Cheese Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese has 286 calories, while Nonfat Chocolate Milk has 58.333333333333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is String Cheese Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese vegan?
No, String Cheese Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between String Cheese Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese and Nonfat Chocolate Milk?
There is a difference of 228 calories per 100g between the two products.
