Head-to-Head Analysis

Sublime Peruvian Chocolate vs Nabisco triscuit crackers roasted garlic 1x9 oz

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sublime Peruvian Chocolate

Sublime Peruvian Chocolate

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Nabisco triscuit crackers roasted garlic 1x9 oz

Nabisco triscuit crackers roasted garlic 1x9 oz

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
554 kcal
Energy
429 kcal
51.9g
Sugars
0g
32.7g
Fat
14.3g
7.6g
Protein
10.7g
0.3g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sublime Peruvian Chocolate and Nabisco triscuit crackers roasted garlic 1x9 oz side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sublime Peruvian Chocolate is the more energy-dense option here, packing 125 more calories per 100g than Nabisco triscuit crackers roasted garlic 1x9 oz. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sublime Peruvian Chocolate contains significantly more sugar (51.9g) compared to the milder Nabisco triscuit crackers roasted garlic 1x9 oz (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Nabisco triscuit crackers roasted garlic 1x9 oz is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sublime Peruvian Chocolate or Nabisco triscuit crackers roasted garlic 1x9 oz?

It depends on your goals. Sublime Peruvian Chocolate has 554 calories, while Nabisco triscuit crackers roasted garlic 1x9 oz has 429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sublime Peruvian Chocolate vegan?

No, Sublime Peruvian Chocolate is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sublime Peruvian Chocolate and Nabisco triscuit crackers roasted garlic 1x9 oz?

There is a difference of 125 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.