Head-to-Head Analysis

Suddenly pasta salad ranch bacon vs Cup Noodles Chicken Flavor

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Suddenly pasta salad ranch bacon

Suddenly pasta salad ranch bacon

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Cup Noodles Chicken Flavor

Cup Noodles Chicken Flavor

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
361.7 kcal
Energy
453 kcal
4.3g
Sugars
3.1g
2.1g
Fat
17.2g
12.8g
Protein
9.4g
1.4g
Salt
4.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Suddenly pasta salad ranch bacon and Cup Noodles Chicken Flavor side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Suddenly pasta salad ranch bacon is the clear winner. With 91 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Suddenly pasta salad ranch bacon contains significantly more sugar (4.2553g) compared to the milder Cup Noodles Chicken Flavor (3.12g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Cup Noodles Chicken Flavor is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Suddenly pasta salad ranch bacon offers a protein boost with 12.77g per 100g, outperforming Cup Noodles Chicken Flavor in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Suddenly pasta salad ranch bacon or Cup Noodles Chicken Flavor?

It depends on your goals. Suddenly pasta salad ranch bacon has 361.7 calories, while Cup Noodles Chicken Flavor has 453 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Suddenly pasta salad ranch bacon vegan?

No, Suddenly pasta salad ranch bacon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Suddenly pasta salad ranch bacon and Cup Noodles Chicken Flavor?

There is a difference of 91 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.