Sugar Cones vs Sweet Gherkins
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Sugar Cones
Sweet Gherkins
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Sugar Cones and Sweet Gherkins side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Sugar Cones is the more energy-dense option here, packing 257 more calories per 100g than Sweet Gherkins. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Sugar Cones takes the lead with only 26.7g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sweet Gherkins contains 32.1g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Sugar Cones offers a protein boost with 6.67g per 100g, outperforming Sweet Gherkins in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Sugar Cones or Sweet Gherkins?
It depends on your goals. Sugar Cones has 400 calories, while Sweet Gherkins has 143 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Sugar Cones vegan?
No, Sugar Cones is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Sugar Cones and Sweet Gherkins?
There is a difference of 257 calories per 100g between the two products.
