Sugar Cones vs The Original Malted Milk Balls
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Sugar Cones
The Original Malted Milk Balls
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Sugar Cones and The Original Malted Milk Balls side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Sugar Cones is the clear winner. With 216 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Sugar Cones takes the lead with only 26.7g of sugar per 100g, whereas The Original Malted Milk Balls contains 117g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Sugar Cones offers a protein boost with 6.67g per 100g, outperforming The Original Malted Milk Balls in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Sugar Cones or The Original Malted Milk Balls?
Sugar Cones appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Sugar Cones vegan?
No, Sugar Cones is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Sugar Cones and The Original Malted Milk Balls?
There is a difference of 216 calories per 100g between the two products.
