Head-to-Head Analysis

Sugar Cones vs Mamba Sour

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Sugar Cones

Sugar Cones

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Mamba Sour

Mamba Sour

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
415 kcal
0g
Sugars
67.9g
0g
Fat
5.7g
0g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sugar Cones and Mamba Sour side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Sugar Cones is the clear winner. With 415 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Sugar Cones takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Mamba Sour contains 67.924528301887g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sugar Cones or Mamba Sour?

Sugar Cones appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Sugar Cones vegan?

No, Sugar Cones is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sugar Cones and Mamba Sour?

There is a difference of 415 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.