Sugar cones vs Almondmilk
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Sugar cones
Almondmilk
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Sugar cones and Almondmilk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Sugar cones is the more energy-dense option here, packing 294 more calories per 100g than Almondmilk. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Sugar cones contains significantly more sugar (26.666666666667g) compared to the milder Almondmilk (0.588g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Almondmilk is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Sugar cones offers a protein boost with 6.6666666666667g per 100g, outperforming Almondmilk in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Sugar cones or Almondmilk?
It depends on your goals. Sugar cones has 400 calories, while Almondmilk has 106 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Sugar cones vegan?
No, Sugar cones is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Sugar cones and Almondmilk?
There is a difference of 294 calories per 100g between the two products.
