Head-to-Head Analysis

Super Dark Taza Chocolate vs Fruit by the Foot Variety Pack 12 Count

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Super Dark Taza Chocolate

Super Dark Taza Chocolate

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Fruit by the Foot Variety Pack 12 Count

Fruit by the Foot Variety Pack 12 Count

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
571 kcal
Energy
381 kcal
15.6g
Sugars
47.6g
36.4g
Fat
4.8g
11.7g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Super Dark Taza Chocolate and Fruit by the Foot Variety Pack 12 Count side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Super Dark Taza Chocolate is the more energy-dense option here, packing 190 more calories per 100g than Fruit by the Foot Variety Pack 12 Count. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Super Dark Taza Chocolate takes the lead with only 15.6g of sugar per 100g, whereas Fruit by the Foot Variety Pack 12 Count contains 47.6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Super Dark Taza Chocolate offers a protein boost with 11.7g per 100g, outperforming Fruit by the Foot Variety Pack 12 Count in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Super Dark Taza Chocolate or Fruit by the Foot Variety Pack 12 Count?

It depends on your goals. Super Dark Taza Chocolate has 571 calories, while Fruit by the Foot Variety Pack 12 Count has 381 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Super Dark Taza Chocolate vegan?

No, Super Dark Taza Chocolate is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Super Dark Taza Chocolate and Fruit by the Foot Variety Pack 12 Count?

There is a difference of 190 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.