Head-to-Head Analysis

SUPER! MAC Shells & White Cheddar vs Beef & Short Rib Lasagna

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of SUPER! MAC Shells & White Cheddar

SUPER! MAC Shells & White Cheddar

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Beef & Short Rib Lasagna

Beef & Short Rib Lasagna

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
392 kcal
Energy
160 kcal
6.8g
Sugars
4g
6.1g
Fat
7.5g
20.3g
Protein
10g
2.2g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing SUPER! MAC Shells & White Cheddar and Beef & Short Rib Lasagna side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

SUPER! MAC Shells & White Cheddar is the more energy-dense option here, packing 232 more calories per 100g than Beef & Short Rib Lasagna. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. SUPER! MAC Shells & White Cheddar contains significantly more sugar (6.76g) compared to the milder Beef & Short Rib Lasagna (4g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Beef & Short Rib Lasagna is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? SUPER! MAC Shells & White Cheddar offers a protein boost with 20.3g per 100g, outperforming Beef & Short Rib Lasagna in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: SUPER! MAC Shells & White Cheddar or Beef & Short Rib Lasagna?

It depends on your goals. SUPER! MAC Shells & White Cheddar has 392 calories, while Beef & Short Rib Lasagna has 160 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is SUPER! MAC Shells & White Cheddar vegan?

No, SUPER! MAC Shells & White Cheddar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between SUPER! MAC Shells & White Cheddar and Beef & Short Rib Lasagna?

There is a difference of 232 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.