Head-to-Head Analysis

Super Mario Holiday Countdown Calendar vs Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Super Mario Holiday Countdown Calendar

Super Mario Holiday Countdown Calendar

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps

Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
540 kcal
Energy
433.3 kcal
58g
Sugars
3.3g
30g
Fat
15g
6g
Protein
6.7g
0.3g
Salt
1.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Super Mario Holiday Countdown Calendar and Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Super Mario Holiday Countdown Calendar is the more energy-dense option here, packing 107 more calories per 100g than Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Super Mario Holiday Countdown Calendar contains significantly more sugar (58g) compared to the milder Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps (3.3333333333333g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Super Mario Holiday Countdown Calendar or Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps?

It depends on your goals. Super Mario Holiday Countdown Calendar has 540 calories, while Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps has 433.33333333333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Super Mario Holiday Countdown Calendar vegan?

No, Super Mario Holiday Countdown Calendar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Super Mario Holiday Countdown Calendar and Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps?

There is a difference of 107 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.