Head-to-Head Analysis

Super Soft Wholemeal medium sliced vs Organic Green Banana Flour

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Super Soft Wholemeal medium sliced

Super Soft Wholemeal medium sliced

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Green Banana Flour

Organic Green Banana Flour

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
223 kcal
Energy
339 kcal
6.5g
Sugars
0g
2.2g
Fat
0g
13.5g
Protein
3.6g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Super Soft Wholemeal medium sliced and Organic Green Banana Flour side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Super Soft Wholemeal medium sliced is the clear winner. With 116 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Super Soft Wholemeal medium sliced contains significantly more sugar (6.49g) compared to the milder Organic Green Banana Flour (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Green Banana Flour is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Super Soft Wholemeal medium sliced offers a protein boost with 13.5g per 100g, outperforming Organic Green Banana Flour in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Super Soft Wholemeal medium sliced or Organic Green Banana Flour?

It depends on your goals. Super Soft Wholemeal medium sliced has 223 calories, while Organic Green Banana Flour has 339 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Super Soft Wholemeal medium sliced vegan?

No, Super Soft Wholemeal medium sliced is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Super Soft Wholemeal medium sliced and Organic Green Banana Flour?

There is a difference of 116 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.