Head-to-Head Analysis

Supercalm - lemon lime vs Lay's Kettle Cooked Sea Salt & Cracked Pepper Flavored Potato chips 8.5 Ounce Plastic Bag

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Supercalm - lemon lime

Supercalm - lemon lime

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Lay's Kettle Cooked Sea Salt & Cracked Pepper Flavored Potato chips 8.5 Ounce Plastic Bag

Lay's Kettle Cooked Sea Salt & Cracked Pepper Flavored Potato chips 8.5 Ounce Plastic Bag

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
94.3 kcal
Energy
536 kcal
0g
Sugars
3.6g
0g
Fat
32.1g
0g
Protein
7.1g
0g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Supercalm - lemon lime and Lay's Kettle Cooked Sea Salt & Cracked Pepper Flavored Potato chips 8.5 Ounce Plastic Bag side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Supercalm - lemon lime is the clear winner. With 442 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Supercalm - lemon lime takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Lay's Kettle Cooked Sea Salt & Cracked Pepper Flavored Potato chips 8.5 Ounce Plastic Bag contains 3.57g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Supercalm - lemon lime or Lay's Kettle Cooked Sea Salt & Cracked Pepper Flavored Potato chips 8.5 Ounce Plastic Bag?

Supercalm - lemon lime appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Supercalm - lemon lime vegan?

No, Supercalm - lemon lime is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Supercalm - lemon lime and Lay's Kettle Cooked Sea Salt & Cracked Pepper Flavored Potato chips 8.5 Ounce Plastic Bag?

There is a difference of 442 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.