Head-to-Head Analysis

Superior touch reduced sodium vegetable base vs Hummus

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Superior touch reduced sodium vegetable base

Superior touch reduced sodium vegetable base

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Hummus

Hummus

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
166.7 kcal
Energy
321.4 kcal
16.7g
Sugars
3.6g
0g
Fat
28.6g
16.7g
Protein
7.1g
20.8g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Superior touch reduced sodium vegetable base and Hummus side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Superior touch reduced sodium vegetable base is the clear winner. With 155 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Superior touch reduced sodium vegetable base contains significantly more sugar (16.666666666667g) compared to the milder Hummus (3.5714285714286g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Hummus is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Superior touch reduced sodium vegetable base offers a protein boost with 16.666666666667g per 100g, outperforming Hummus in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Superior touch reduced sodium vegetable base or Hummus?

It depends on your goals. Superior touch reduced sodium vegetable base has 166.66666666667 calories, while Hummus has 321.42857142857 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Superior touch reduced sodium vegetable base vegan?

No, Superior touch reduced sodium vegetable base is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Superior touch reduced sodium vegetable base and Hummus?

There is a difference of 155 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.