Head-to-Head Analysis

SURIMI FLAKE STICKS SABOR CANGREJO vs Sardinillas with sweet piquillo peppers wild

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of SURIMI FLAKE STICKS SABOR CANGREJO

SURIMI FLAKE STICKS SABOR CANGREJO

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sardinillas with sweet piquillo peppers wild

Sardinillas with sweet piquillo peppers wild

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
129 kcal
Energy
188 kcal
4.7g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
11.8g
5.9g
Protein
21.2g
2.2g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing SURIMI FLAKE STICKS SABOR CANGREJO and Sardinillas with sweet piquillo peppers wild side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, SURIMI FLAKE STICKS SABOR CANGREJO is the clear winner. With 59 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. SURIMI FLAKE STICKS SABOR CANGREJO contains significantly more sugar (4.71g) compared to the milder Sardinillas with sweet piquillo peppers wild (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sardinillas with sweet piquillo peppers wild is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: SURIMI FLAKE STICKS SABOR CANGREJO or Sardinillas with sweet piquillo peppers wild?

It depends on your goals. SURIMI FLAKE STICKS SABOR CANGREJO has 129 calories, while Sardinillas with sweet piquillo peppers wild has 188 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is SURIMI FLAKE STICKS SABOR CANGREJO vegan?

No, SURIMI FLAKE STICKS SABOR CANGREJO is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between SURIMI FLAKE STICKS SABOR CANGREJO and Sardinillas with sweet piquillo peppers wild?

There is a difference of 59 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.