Head-to-Head Analysis

Swedish Fish vs Simply Ruffles

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Swedish Fish

Swedish Fish

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Simply Ruffles

Simply Ruffles

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
366.7 kcal
Energy
571.4 kcal
76.7g
Sugars
3.6g
0g
Fat
35.7g
0g
Protein
7.1g
0.2g
Salt
1.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Swedish Fish and Simply Ruffles side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Swedish Fish is the clear winner. With 205 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Swedish Fish contains significantly more sugar (76.666666666667g) compared to the milder Simply Ruffles (3.5714285714286g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Simply Ruffles is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Swedish Fish or Simply Ruffles?

It depends on your goals. Swedish Fish has 366.66666666667 calories, while Simply Ruffles has 571.42857142857 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Swedish Fish vegan?

No, Swedish Fish is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Swedish Fish and Simply Ruffles?

There is a difference of 205 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.