Head-to-Head Analysis

Sweet And Savory Trail Mix vs Milano; Double Dark Chocolate

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Sweet And Savory Trail Mix

Sweet And Savory Trail Mix

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Milano; Double Dark Chocolate

Milano; Double Dark Chocolate

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
39.3g
Sugars
32.1g
30.4g
Fat
25g
12.5g
Protein
3.6g
0.4g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Sweet And Savory Trail Mix and Milano; Double Dark Chocolate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Sweet And Savory Trail Mix is the more energy-dense option here, packing 0 more calories per 100g than Milano; Double Dark Chocolate. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Sweet And Savory Trail Mix contains significantly more sugar (39.3g) compared to the milder Milano; Double Dark Chocolate (32.1g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Milano; Double Dark Chocolate is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Sweet And Savory Trail Mix offers a protein boost with 12.5g per 100g, outperforming Milano; Double Dark Chocolate in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Sweet And Savory Trail Mix or Milano; Double Dark Chocolate?

It depends on your goals. Sweet And Savory Trail Mix has 500 calories, while Milano; Double Dark Chocolate has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Sweet And Savory Trail Mix vegan?

No, Sweet And Savory Trail Mix is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Sweet And Savory Trail Mix and Milano; Double Dark Chocolate?

There is a difference of 0 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.